Author: J. Arthur Bloom

J. Arthur Bloom is the blog's editor, opinion editor of the Daily Caller, and an occasional contributor to the Umlaut. He was formerly associate editor of the American Conservative and a music reviewer at Tiny Mix Tapes, and graduated from William and Mary in 2011. He lives in Washington, DC, and can be found, far too often, on Twitter.

Screen Shot 2014-10-12 at 4.34.43 PM

Secession lagniappe

Don Devine on the secession trend:

American hegemony properly controlled thus assists world peace, and secession could threaten international and domestic liberty. Still, secession in its tamed form of federalism and decentralization presents the secret to domestic liberty, especially in larger states. The ability to devolve power to the lowest levels possible—first to the individual, then to the family, to free associations and businesses, to the community, to local and regional government, and only to the national state when no other institution can perform the function—allows freedom to adjust to community differences and make individuals more satisfied with their national state.

Clark Bianco on the persistence of the English Civil War in our red state-blue state divide:

If you visit a red state you will notice higher than average levels of tobacco use, Evangelical Christianity, Ford F-150s, and so on.

If you visit a blue state you will notice higher than average levels of organic foods,evangelical Brightism, Priuses, and so forth.

To a first approximation, these two bags of cultural signifiers have absolutely nothing to do with King Charles I and Oliver Cromwell and the cultures around them.

In fact, though, if you dig a bit deeper you’ll see that there are very solid strands connecting them. The Parliamentarian Roundheads were made up of Diggers (agrarian socialists – who’d think that farmers would be socially liberal?),Levellers (who were into “popular sovereignty”, which is a fancy political science term for a drum circle, I think) and a bunch of near heretics who’s spiritual descendants believe in Crystal Power and Chakras (or perhaps having their female priests and rabbis perform gay marriages in an inclusive church), and always voting Democrat. In short, you’ve got a pretty similar culture alliance in 1614 as you do in 2014.

WRM on a world in flames:

Obama, Merkel, Cameron and Hollande have made plenty of mistakes on their own; words like “Libya” and “Syria” come to mind. But the rip currents through which they must swim are not entirely of their making. They, and we, are reaping the consequences of bad decisions taken two decades ago, when the skies were still bright and the world was full of hope. For a quarter century now, Western policymakers have assumed that history held no more great challenges on the scale of the colossal crises of the 20th century. They have acted as if we had reached some kind of post-historical utopia, and as if our security and prosperity had become so absolute and so embedded that we no longer needed to concern ourselves with the foundations of the world order.

This was foolishly and tragically wrong. We are not yet back in the worst of the bad old days. We have passed from the late 1920s to the early 1930s. A shadow is stirring in Mirkwood, the orcs are roaming the forests, but the Dark Lord hasn’t returned to his Tower.  The historical clock that seemed to slow in the 1990s is ticking faster now. We can no longer afford to live carelessly and large. The days are getting darker, and if we are to avoid a repeat of the horrors of the last century, there is no time to waste and little to spare.

(more…)

7645d926b1acff61607dae2f7949136c8aeb7cc1

‘You should have listened’: Ayn Rand, Left Behind, Doom Paul, and the politics of futility

Hunter Baker wants Christians to get over their “deep ambivalence” about Ayn Rand and stop being so mean to her:

Ayn Rand deserves some of the opposition she has received from Christians and many others. But she also deserves better.

Personally, I’m not ambivalent at all about her, if anything she deserves the Cromwell treatment. But that’s just me.

Perhaps it’s fair for Baker to regret that the most prominent politician to publicly embrace Rand at one time now has to disavow it nearly every time he gives an extended interview. “I completely reject the philosophy of objectivism” is what Paul Ryan said to Jim Rutenberg recently. Is there any comparable ideology that prompts this kind of categorical condemnation from public figures? You get the sense that a politician would have an easier time if it came out that they had dabbled in Scientology or Thelema.

But this isn’t true:

Rand did have disdain for some people, but her lack of respect was not based on physical weakness, class, or color so much as it was aimed at those she thought lacked virtue. Contempt may have its place if it aims at a form of evil.

Characterizing the people of Palestine as “almost totally primitive savages” is disdain based on something other than virtue. I suppose that’s a matter of interpretation. But her war ethics, such as they were, are extremely troubling, and clearly leave the door open to genocide.

In Roy Childs’ letter trying to convert her to anarchism, he links some of these conclusions with the claim that she misunderstands the Constitution and the Cold War. Rand may have been anti-government but she was not an anarchist. Most colorfully, she supported state violence in the sense of being opposed to rules of engagement to mitigate civilian casualties during wartime. She also saw abortion as a “moral right,” which seems to me a lack of respect based on physical weakness.

So, Ayn Rand had pretty destructive views about war, the state, and human solidarity. That’s more than enough to turn me off, but maybe I don’t make enough money. More to the point, should we take it as a sign of defective character when a public figure professes admiration for a person that espouses these views? Perhaps Paul Ryan should not make us as nervous as he seems to make liberal reporters, but it’s not unreasonable, generally speaking, to think so.

(more…)

unnamed (1)

Scenes from the Fourth Rome

Canaanland Apartments near 7th and N, right around the corner from my parish, St. Luke’s at Immaculate Conception. They were built by the pentecostal United House of Prayer, which owns a significant amount of property in DC, and has occasionally been the subject of scandal. The sign reminds me of some sort of space-homestead though.

Just a reminder: We welcome submissions, please send your photos of DC life to [email protected]

The ‘I fight so my child won’t have to’ lie

This piece by Jonathan Raab is heartbreaking and true:

It was a stock answer, and it came in many variations:

“I fight so my child won’t have to.”

It was a popular saying among soldiers during the Iraq-Afghanistan conflicts, especially the ones you saw on TV. It’s a soundbite-friendly philosophy that communicates a sadness for having been at war but a hopefulness in what that war could accomplish. It lent meaning to the drudgery of day-to-day soldiering, and gave people at home (not exactly the homefront by any means, but home, even if upon returning to it it was almost unrecognizable) an insight into the motivations of those who would volunteer to serve, fight, and even die in the name of the United States. …

While we can spin such stories into narratives of honor and family values, they are also a portent of a terrible new truth. We now live in a culture where perpetual warfare with nebulous objectives against an abstract enemy is the norm. We have a whole generation of young people who understand that the nation is at war, has been at war, and will be at war for the foreseeable future, but don’t understand what that really means—or should mean—in the context of a civil, democratic society. This is war without sacrifice, war by choice, war without end. …

Another war is upon us, and in this coming conflict, the seeds are sown for future destabilization and war. Americans seem content to launch war after war against “moral outrage”, but don’t stop to consider that the monsters we fight may be so horrible precisely because we made them that way.

Looking back on all the times my brothers and sisters in uniform said “I fight so my child won’t have to,” or any of its variations, I can’t help but feel a pang of despair.

We thought it would be over, eventually. Our government—in its perpetual funding and arming of our future enemies—has other ideas.

I say ‘lie’ because that’s what this is. Servicemen and women who convince themselves that their children won’t have to fight a war that the government regards as perpetual and unbounded are lying to themselves. Empire never takes a holiday.

We all want our children to grow up in a country that is not in a state of permanent war. The way to do that is not to fight endless, undefined wars now, but to fight the ideologues, war profiteers, and entrenched interests that have a stake in prolonging and starting new ones.

Sacred Harp 121: ‘Florence’

Not many years their rounds shall roll,
Each moment brings it nigh,
Ere all its glories stand revealed,
To our admiring eye.
Ye wheels of nature speed your course,
Ye mortal pow’rs, decay;
Fast as ye bring the night of death,
Ye bring eternal day.

Ye weary, heavy-laden souls,
Who are oppressed and sore,
Ye trav’lers through the wilderness
To Canaan’s peaceful shore.
Though chilling winds and beating rains,
The waters deep and cold,
And enemies surrounding you,
Take courage and be bold.

Though storms and hurricanes arise,
The desert all around,
And fiery serpents oft appear,
Through the enchanted ground.
Dark nights and clouds and gloomy fear —
And dragons often roar —
But while the gospel trump we hear,
We’ll press for Canaan’s shore.